It's arrogant when seen in a larger trend of technologists constantly trying to substitute everything with technology. "When all you have is a hammer, everythin

It's arrogant when seen in a larger trend of technologists constantly trying to substitute everything with technology. "When all you have is a hammer, everything seems like a nail" I too am an amateur/prosumer photographer who uses an entirely digital process. But tech has its weaknesses, especially in photography -- digital tech still can't replicate a lot of what analog can do, and its important to embrace that. That $4000 mirrorless still can't replicate the dynamic range of 35mm film. Photoshop still can't replicate the contrasty reds of Velvia film. And so on...