2 ms·
> but nearly 100% of everyone reading this would have felt some emotional recoil from being called at least one of those two things What's the rationale behind
by dartharva 6y ago
> but nearly 100% of everyone reading this would have felt some emotional recoil from being called at least one of those two things
What's the rationale behind this statement? It seems like it's implying "nearly 100%" people are one or the other kind of extremists when it comes to Gender politics. Wouldn't it rather be the other way round, people knowingly identifying themselves as both Feminists and MRAs (redundant, as "Feminist" by itself means someone who strives for equality among genders), since most are normally moderate in their opinions?
- betwixthewires 6y agoThe rationale behind that statement is explained in the subsequent statements in the article. Something about how there's a difference between agreeing with some group or cause's ststet principles and identifying as an in group member as a part of ones identity. The article explains it better than I am.