The tldr of this article is supposedly "be more incremental". But the undertones are basically "exploit more and explore less because exploring is expensive".

The tldr of this article is supposedly "be more incremental". But the undertones are basically "exploit more and explore less because exploring is expensive". It would be nice if the authors had the courage to propose a concrete economic model for what the right balance is and to do a fair accounting of the positive externalities of these projects, rather than just give a cherry-picked anecdotal laundry list of failed products.