3 ms·
It's not about an assumption of corruption. It's about the fact that the FBI took something which they had absolutely no right to take. Whether or not they loo
by bgentry 15y ago
It's not about an assumption of corruption. It's about the fact that the FBI took something which they had absolutely no right to take.
Whether or not they looked at or did anything with the data on his servers is irrelevant to the fact that they violated constitutional provisions against unreasonable search and seizure.
- canistr 15y agoHe did make it a point in his initial post to claim the passwords were salted. Meaning he wanted to assure his users they were protected from even the FBI. Furthermore, assuming the FBI wanted to seize and investigate his servers for their own nefarious purpose. But remember, let's not confuse direct violation of constitutional rights with mistakes.