2 ms·
The interesting implication here is the stone seems to mark the 'official' border and the nobody but the farmer can move it back without engaging in some sort o
by purple_ferret 5y ago
The interesting implication here is the stone seems to mark the 'official' border and the nobody but the farmer can move it back without engaging in some sort of bureaucratic process.
If it is in, presumably, French territory now, why can't some French resident roll it back?
- vidarh 5y agoI'd be more inclined to assume it's just that nobody wants the hassle, and so it's easier to just insist it's up to the farmer.
- mytailorisrich 5y agoYeah, I read this as "just put it back where it was and we'll all forget it ever happened".
- Arnavion 5y agoAlso, they probably want to make sure the farmer knows that it's not supposed to be moved, so that he doesn't just move it again.