4 ms·

Your comment doesn't make sense, it sounds like new-age nonsense. I don't even understand what you're trying to say. What is a magnetic frequency? What does it

Your comment doesn't make sense, it sounds like new-age nonsense. I don't even understand what you're trying to say. What is a magnetic frequency? What does it mean to be "activated in time"? How does any of that relate to the question? There is no need for a "hypothesis" here, mp3 is not a mysterious physical phenomenon, it is a well-defined file format, backed by well-understood signal processing.

achillesheels 5y ago
Sir, it relates to how does the information in the mp3 file maintain its fidelity whereas a spectrogram transformation of the original analog sampling becomes corrupted. Are you familiar with digital signal processing and sampling theory? Are you familiar with it to the most fundamentally electromagnetic level of understanding? Are you familiar with how computer memory is electromagnetically cached? I’m quite alarmed that I am being virtually thrown under the bus by those who do not have the knowledge on how they program electromagnetic waveforms.
- detaro 5y ago
  Sorry, but it's patently obvious that you are the one who isn't familiar with how any of this works. A spectrogram isn't corrupted, it's just a representation that chooses to not record some information - and thus it's not surprising that the information it excludes isn't recoverable. Whereas an MP3 is designed to include this information. That's all that is to it. Anything "electromagnetic" is entirely irrelevant at that level.
  - achillesheels 5y ago
    Well thank you for educating me on the spectrogram. But is not the spectrogram a digital system, ie software, output? Are you simply saying the program itself does not find it resourceful to reconstruct the analog time-series with complete fidelity? Why wouldn’t it? In theory it should be able to, know? I had been merely supposing the spectrogram software programming causes such spurious frequencies rather than actual filtering of what is still fundamentally electromagnetic action.

achillesheels 5y ago

Sir, it relates to how does the information in the mp3 file maintain its fidelity whereas a spectrogram transformation of the original analog sampling becomes corrupted. Are you familiar with digital signal processing and sampling theory? Are you familiar with it to the most fundamentally electromagnetic level of understanding? Are you familiar with how computer memory is electromagnetically cached? I’m quite alarmed that I am being virtually thrown under the bus by those who do not have the knowledge on how they program electromagnetic waveforms.

detaro 5y ago
Sorry, but it's patently obvious that you are the one who isn't familiar with how any of this works. A spectrogram isn't corrupted, it's just a representation that chooses to not record some information - and thus it's not surprising that the information it excludes isn't recoverable. Whereas an MP3 is designed to include this information. That's all that is to it. Anything "electromagnetic" is entirely irrelevant at that level.
- achillesheels 5y ago
  Well thank you for educating me on the spectrogram. But is not the spectrogram a digital system, ie software, output? Are you simply saying the program itself does not find it resourceful to reconstruct the analog time-series with complete fidelity? Why wouldn’t it? In theory it should be able to, know? I had been merely supposing the spectrogram software programming causes such spurious frequencies rather than actual filtering of what is still fundamentally electromagnetic action.