The picture was taken and captioned last March: https://www.reuters.com/search/pictures?blob=Tenaska+Imperial+Solar+Energy+Center+South&sortBy=&dateRange= https

The picture was taken and captioned last March: https://www.reuters.com/search/pictures?blob=Tenaska+Imperial+Solar+Energy+Center+South&sortBy=&dateRange= https://www.reuters.com/search/pictures?blob=Tenaska+Imperia... This article just uses it without any changes. The caption would have been somewhat less strange at that point (but still hard to contextualize). Edit: Oops, the earliest date is June 2020. Doesn't really change the explanation any though.