Of course I’m serious. I explicitly state I’m not absolving Amazon of anything. What I’m saying is that the article contains no information at all on any dirty

Of course I’m serious. I explicitly state I’m not absolving Amazon of anything. What I’m saying is that the article contains no information at all on any dirty tricks being used, yet implies acting in bad faith. That’s just bad reporting. If it’s not legitimate then point out in the article why, the reporter failed to do that. Not paying profit taxes on a loss is the most normal thing in the world. Paying billions in salex tax (as Amazon did) on tens of billions in revenue, is also the most normal thing in the world. Where’s the issue? The article doesn’t clarify whatsoever.