> I bet this article itself was written in texmacs and exported to html. you won. Actually as I wrote in another comment all the TeXmacs website, the blog in w

> I bet this article itself was written in texmacs and exported to html. you won. Actually as I wrote in another comment all the TeXmacs website, the blog in which the article appears, the web page of the main developer and some other websites are completely generated within TeXmacs with no assistance whatsoever from external static site generators. The content can be edited directly in TeXmacs and the hyperlinks works connecting the TeXmacs documents, so you can navigate and edit the website from within the program. This workflow has some advantages and some users adopted it for their own blogs (https://plopezadeva.com https://plopezadeva.com). If you strive for minimialism (with a touch of style) I can see hardly how you can more minimal. If you do not like the colors you can always change them. The typeface and the colors are defined in CSS, so you can provide those of your likings. For more fancy workflows a user developed a Markdown converted so that he can write his articles in TeXmacs and then use them with Hugo (here the result https://paperwhy.8027.org https://paperwhy.8027.org) The graphics editor was buggy, but I find quite stable now. Lately it never blow in my face and if a speaker is writing on a blackboard I can essentially copy his drawings. If I'm lecturing on Zoom I usually use the graphics editor to illustrate some ideas ( see some examples here https://www.iam.uni-bonn.de/fileadmin/user_upload/gubinelli/einf-wahr-ws2021/wt-ws2120-script-12.pdf https://www.iam.uni-bonn.de/fileadmin/user_upload/gubinelli/... , note that this is the actual script of the lecture, written online and not postprocessed )