3 ms·
Its basically abusing the the 3rd party doctrine to get around legal requirements. Its definitely against the spirit of the law. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wi
by anfilt 5y ago
Its basically abusing the the 3rd party doctrine to get around legal requirements.
Its definitely against the spirit of the law.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third-party_doctrine https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third-party_doctrine
- HDMI_Cable 5y agoI’m not one of those people who think that the US is broken (I’ve seen other countries, and am thankful for being born in NA) but the third-party-doctrine is one of the few things that just baffles me. How can a precedent which is so obviously malicious be allowed to exist?
- MikeUt 5y agoIt's more accurate to say the 3rd party doctrine goes around rights, not just legal requirements. The 3rd party is forced to betray its clients to the government, even against its will. In other words, this doctrine doesn't only let government agents do something they otherwise wouldn't be allowed - it also lets them force others to do something, pressing them into government service.