7 ms·
I agree with the point of 'doesn't mean credible', but the traditional TLDs of .com/.net/.org are also much better recognized as an actual TLD. If I start a ne
by walrus01 6y ago
I agree with the point of 'doesn't mean credible', but the traditional TLDs of .com/.net/.org are also much better recognized as an actual TLD.
If I start a new taco truck company and put "burrito.services" or "burrito.catering" or "burrito.ai" in a huge font on the side of the trucks, a fairly large number of people aren't going to immediately recognize that as a web site address.
On the other hand, if I'm lucky enough to get the domain burrito.net , most people will recognize that as something they can type into a web browser address bar.
- sidpatil 6y ago> If I start a new taco truck company and put "burrito.services" or "burrito.catering" or "burrito.ai" in a huge font on the side of the trucks, a fairly large number of people aren't going to immediately recognize that as a web site address. Well, unless you put "http(s)://" in front of it.
- fireattack 6y agoInterestingly burrito.catering used to be a thing it looks: https://web.archive.org/web/20180804010349/http://burrito.catering/ https://web.archive.org/web/20180804010349/http://burrito.ca...
- walrus01 6y agoCertainly, though the trend for printing vehicles, business cards, letterheads, outdoor advertising signs and such seems to be to omit the "http(s)://" or "www"... Since in real world use almost nobody is actually typing the http:// http:// into the browser anymore, as might have been necessary when we were running Netscape Navigator in 1999.
- surround 6y ago> As early as 1996 browsers were already inserting the http:// http:// and www. for users automatically (rendering any advertisement which still contains them truly ridiculous). https://blog.cloudflare.com/the-history-of-the-url/ https://blog.cloudflare.com/the-history-of-the-url/
- walrus01 6y agoThat, and in a typical virtualhost based http/https setup now, it's standard DNS configuration to point the A record for the 'root' of the domain (domainname.com) to the same IP address as the www.domainname.com DNS record.
- rightbyte 6y agoFor some reason I typed "www" for an emberessly long time.
- defaultname 6y agoA pretty good percentage of people are just going to remember it as burrito.com. Alternate TLDs are fine for clickable media, but fall apart in print form.
- fatnoah 6y agoI'm pretty sure this is why (in the US at least) we end up with online gambling sites located at .com addresses with "free" counterparts at .net addresses. You can advertise the free .net sites because they're not gambling with money, but people typing the addresses in simply go to the .com versions.
- defaultname 6y agoFascinating! I'd never noticed this before. Normal television is dominated by those free-to-play gambling sites, and as you mentioned overwhelmingly they seem to use .net. I always wondered how they made money.
- moehm 6y agoOr "www", as in "www.burrito.catering".
- hunter2_ 6y agoThat actually strikes me as anachronistic, because it became popular to drop "www" (not only in print media, but also in the canonical FQDN) well before these sort of TLDs became available.
- moehm 6y agoThis is correct, though I still believe most people understand the meaning that it's a website if I prepend the "www". On the other hand, I guess most people probably aren't typing the url out anyway but googling it instead.
- walrus01 6y agoAlso correct, though using my example and weird new TLDs, let's say in a theoretical example I see a bus stop outdoor advertising board on the street that says: "BURRITO.CONSULTING" I'm going to think, "uhhh, is that a website? Well, I recognize .consulting as a TLD. I guess it must be. But that's weird..." but then if i see the same sign "WWW.BURRITO.CONSULTING" I'm going to think: "Well that's definitely somebody's website, but what a weird and anachronistic way of printing it, and why is it using one of those new long generic TLDs anyways..."
- deepstack 6y agoyeah it is a techy thing. Most people who are not techy use "WWW", we just got to go with this. Edit your web server config to handle that.
- stephenhuey 6y agoExactly. There is plenty of discussion to be found online in techie circles, but in short, if you’re going to use a naked domain to host your website, at least redirect www to it.
- scythe 6y agoI think that's a good thing. There should not be an unmitigated explosion of TLDs. A few will pop up that appeal to lots of users, say .taco, and the .com monoculture can be split into a manageable number of TLDs. Humanity is great at this stuff. Natural language is enervated with side channels everywhere. At some point, people may converge on "what a TLD looks like" and new TLDs will often have an ineffable TLD-ness about them.
- nine_k 6y agoI think the reverse is going to happen. In the search for short, expressive names more TLDs are going to proliferate, so eventually many common words will become TLDs. It will be hard to know what is a TLD, except for a few old, well-known ones, like .com, .org, .net, etc.
- riffic 6y ago> There should not be an unmitigated explosion of TLDs. too late.
- CivBase 6y ago> Well, unless you put "http(s)://" in front of it. Go with "https://www.burrito.services/ https://www.burrito.services/" and make it blue and underlined, just to be safe. I'm kind of kidding, but I also kind of suspect the blue font and underline would probably be more immediately recognizable for many people than the HTTPS protocol prefix.
- ipython 6y agoI had a similar experience with a side project. I used an .app tld since it was available and, hey, it seemed kind of cool. Then I told my friends and they were totally confused- “your apps not on the App Store?” Ugh. Lesson learned.
- mr_cyborg 6y agoI own a .app domain and in naming a folder on my Mac that I lost the ability to open the folder in Finder. Cracked me up and outside of the terminal I could find no solution.
- mschuster91 6y agoRight click and View Content should help you out
- mr_cyborg 6y agoThis is good to note. I remember I was trying to hit return to rename it and that would just open it. I was probably tired because I felt so flabbergasted! It looks like you can rename from right click too. Not sure how I missed that
- scsilver 6y agoTheres a mac toggle to show hidden files/folder in finder. The prefix . makes those folders hidden
- mr_cyborg 6y agoThanks for this reply - for me it was “website.app” so this wouldn’t have applied
- vmception 6y agoIf your engagement strategy relies on users typing in your domain name you need to sue whatever time displaced guru faxed you their internet marketing manual
- walrus01 6y agoNot my point at all, rather, that a well chosen domain name that's immediately recognizable as such, and a part of the corporate identity and trademarks, is an essential part of having an Internet presence. Also ultimately your domain name and wherever its MX record points to is the start of authority for setting up official business accounts with all of the popular social media promotion channels (you sure aren't letting your social media people run the company instagram page from an account linked to their personal gmail accounts, are you?) By no means would I say that people should ignore all the other ways of driving traffic to a company's online marketing presence, via all other modern means of social media (instagram, tiktok, facebook, twitter, whatever is the new hot thing of the current year). And having a dedicated app, partnership with third party food ordering services if you're something like a burrito delivery service.
- dkersten 6y ago> you sure aren't letting your social media people run the company instagram page from an account linked to their personal gmail accounts, are you? If you're running a burrito truck, there's a good chance this is exactly what's happening.
- walrus01 6y agoIn the theoretical example I didn't literally mean a burrito truck, but a silly example of "I'm running a business in $marketsegment and I'm going to print all my company vehicles with $companynameurlrelatedtomarketsegment". The burrito part was chosen as a placeholder much as we might use Alice, Bob, Charlie in a discussion of cryptosystems.
- dkersten 6y ago
- phreack 6y agoHow about putting a Chrome icon next to 'burrito.catering' as if it were a social network? The implications are awful but the results might be effective
- walrus01 6y agoI fear we are going that way. It's already become almost a default industry standard for a lot of retail customer facing things to have the trifecta of nicely rendered, equally sized icons for facebook, instagram and twitter next to their brand name.
- lkuty 6y agoI might think that your company is providing Haskell consulting services since monads are like burritos [1]. [1]: https://blog.plover.com/prog/burritos.html https://blog.plover.com/prog/burritos.html
- c22 6y agoI think most people these days may not use URLs at all. They will type whatever is written on the side of your truck into their search engine, which is also their address bar, and they will click on the first result.
- sunshineforever 6y agoThey will probably type whatever is written with the name of the city after it
- sameerds 6y agoI think those custom TLDs will work just fine. It might confuse customers a bit, but most of them will just type "burrito.catering" in Google and miraculously reach the correct website anyway. EDIT: In case it's not obvious, the fact is that most people don't type the website address in the URL bar. They type it in the Google search bar.
- Asdrubalini 6y agoMost people don't even know that .catering is a domain name, so they might not recognize it as an actual website... burrito-catering.com would be much better imho
- smichel17 6y agoMaybe it's time for good 'ol www to make a comeback.
- hombre_fatal 6y agoAlso, a weird TLD like ".catering" usually means you're trying to use a generic word in the domain name, "burrito" in this case, which makes it even harder to remember than something more unique + ".com". The effect is that people have to now remember two generic dictionary words. "burrito" and ".catering", or wait, wasn't it "tacos" and ".food" or something? And like you said, I'm sure most people don't even recognize that ".catering" is a TLD, whatever that is, and the domain name just looks like `<genericword>.<genericword>` making it all the more confusing and arbitrary. It's like having to remember where the periods went in "del.icio.us" and, if you couldn't, googling "delicious" (until it caught on) was incredibly unhelpful. Just like googling "burrito catering" doesn't necessarily take you to "https://burrito.catering https://burrito.catering". I think even a random brand name + ".com" is still preferable to most of these new TLDs.
- LeifCarrotson 6y agoEven then, you've got a large SEO and trademark barrier. Can you out-rank Qdoba for the words "burrito" and "catering"? If you do, can you use your trademark recognition to fend off competitors at better-burrito-catering.com? Like Qdoba, choose something unique. The domain caterrito.com is a little overspecific, but memorable, unique, easily trademarked, and available.
- s_dev 6y agoConveying it's website is easy though -- stick a protocol or www in front of it. Or even underline it an colour it blue! www.burrito.ai or https://burrito.ai https://burrito.ai is obviously a website to any layman. Yes -- a server admin will tell you they are all different but generally speaking it will redirect to a preferred naming convention.
- threatofrain 6y agoBut that looks very ugly in branding for the side of a truck.
- snicker7 6y ago[www.]burrito.ai
- threatofrain 6y agoOr wit.ai www.wit.ai
- ratww 6y agoAnother thing about new domains is that sometimes they can get caught up in spam filters. I already suspected that reliably sending an email from an .xyz domain is very difficult, but I learned the hard way that that lots of enterprise filters also block emails that contain links to any domain ending with .xyz, so we had to use something less fancy, so a longer .com was it.