3 ms·
I would say that your moral obligation is to speak well of Microsoft when you speak of them - as they treated you well it would be wrong for you to disparage th
by ALittleLight 6y ago
I would say that your moral obligation is to speak well of Microsoft when you speak of them - as they treated you well it would be wrong for you to disparage them. You don't have any obligation to work for Microsoft longer than you want to though.
- dnautics 6y agoI would consider it a standard of politeness... but is that a moral obligation? What if you were treated very well but quit because you didn't like some of their... secure datacenters? Given that sort of a conflict can occur, exactly where does this moral obligation stem from?
- jbay808 6y agoMaybe to go one step deeper, the moral obligation is to speak honestly and fairly to the extent that one is able, and as their honest impression was positive, then the moral obligation to speak (honestly) positively follows from that.
- DaiPlusPlus 6y agoOh, of course - I don't mean that I believe Microsoft can do no-wrong: on the contrary, it (hyperbole warning) breaks my heart whenever I see Microsoft do something I feel is morally wrong or otherwise disappointing. Like seeing a loved-one go-off-the-rails, I suppose.
- Barrin92 6y ago>as they treated you well it would be wrong for you to disparage them that's somewhere between loyalty and patronage. A moral obligation is to speak the truth, regardless if someone treated you well or not.