The details do matter, though. By omitting details you create a hypothetical position that is less reasonable and easier for you to criticize. In this particula

The details do matter, though. By omitting details you create a hypothetical position that is less reasonable and easier for you to criticize. In this particular situation, this type of thing is particularly harmful because it paints the supposed originators of this made up position as something they are not. You could arguably consider it as libel by omission. I don't even mean to single you out because I've seen this type of thing countless times on here and especially on Twitter over the last week or so. "What's more interesting is the awkward situation they have created, which I'd argue is a false dichotomy - where does "societal politics" end and "politics that directly relate to our business or products" start?" That can be tricky, which is why the policy is not zero tolerance and they already anticipate and are OK with people sometimes getting it wrong.