3 ms·
It’s a bit of a circular logic though, isn’t it? Apple can’t be first, therefore they aren’t first and the sensors are useless. Personally, I have no opinion on
by kergonath 6y ago
It’s a bit of a circular logic though, isn’t it? Apple can’t be first, therefore they aren’t first and the sensors are useless. Personally, I have no opinion on the technology, but Apple is actually commonly the first company to use some new technologies in mass-market devices.
What they usually do is find a small company with some compelling technology and then either fund it to gain exclusive or privileged access, or buy it outright. The story here (that a small company working on cutting edge sensors has close links with Apple) fits that pattern perfectly.
- PurpleFoxy 6y agoApple is rarely ever the absolute first. Usually similar things have existed for a while and apple comes in and makes them much better and more accessible. Sure, maybe apple is first this time but I have a hard time believing Apple is at the cutting edge of new medical technology.
- boardwaalk 6y agoI believe (could be wrong), that Apple was the first to have a mass-market wearable with a ECG feature. So you don’t even have do look that far to find a refutation. I don’t know about how innovative these rumored sensors may to comparatively, though.