3 ms·
Just Terminal 1: screen Terminal 2: screen -x seems to be enough, too.
by jolmg 6y ago
Just
Terminal 1:
screen
Terminal 2:
screen -x
seems to be enough, too.
- spurgu 6y agoYes, but it gets confusing if you already have previous screens running (-x opens the right one if you only have one) so I provided a more "foolproof" version. I always use named screens since it's quicker and more organized than typing `screen -ls` before every time and then making a decision on whether or not to name the new one (I still think it's better to name the first one in any case in the vast majority of (my) cases).