>This began well after they entered the market and upset the dominance of established players. I still find it unlikely that it is an isolated incident, but th

>This began well after they entered the market and upset the dominance of established players. I still find it unlikely that it is an isolated incident, but that decade is also when they started to pass the mentioned 10%. >But this is ultimately sophomoric economic thinking. Your attempt to explain why the competition may be unable to compete is "they're just better." Beyond that, you just say smaller is better, which is the point of my argument.