3 ms·
I'm not entirely sure we disagree on the point I was attempting to make. I didn't say that one should never be allowed to choose between being the CEO or havin
by alex_young 5y ago
I'm not entirely sure we disagree on the point I was attempting to make.
I didn't say that one should never be allowed to choose between being the CEO or having children at the same time, but I do think it's a societal failure if the choice is between having a career at all and having children, especially if that's a gendered ultimatum.
I may actually disagree with you on the CEO point in another way however -
Who knows, but I suspect some CEOs manage to spend time with their kids and run a successful company. As you say there are tradeoffs in life, and some people choose to have a family and others choose to take up fly fishing or something. It doesn't seem like this necessarily precludes anyone from starting a successful company. Some may even find that parenting gives them the insight they need to be successful in business.
- danielmarkbruce 5y agoNo one is saying the choice is "career at all" v "spending time with children". It's "having a crazy busy career" v "spending time with children". It can't be any other way. If one is willing to give up everything for X, they are almost certainly going to do better at X compared to equivalent folks who aren't willing to give it up. And, it isn't a choice society makes. Individuals make it, for themselves. Society isn't failing in the sense of having to make choices. Society is failing when it glorifies those to give up everything for X. It's just a choice, and it's usually not glorious.