4 ms·
> EDIT: little tidbit, much like the online org-mode manual, judging by the typeface and the color of the hyperlinks, I bet this article itself was written in t
by omaranto 5y ago
> EDIT: little tidbit, much like the online org-mode manual, judging by the typeface and the color of the hyperlinks, I bet this article itself was written in texmacs and exported to html.
Even more than the typeface and the hyperlink color, I found this to be a give away :P
"Figure 1. This article has been written in TeXmacs. The image shows the article being drafted and the management of the figures within the program."
- mgubi 5y agoI'm sorry you do not like it. Actually is borderline for me too. But I didn't resisted...
- omaranto 5y agoDid you reply to the wrong comment?
- mgubi 5y agoI do not think so. I understood you didn't liked the Figure comment (and maybe the figure itself)?
- omaranto 5y agoAh! No, no, that's not what I meant at all. User noobermin guessed that the web page was written in TeXmacs and exported to HTML by analyzing subtle hints such as the typeface and the color of the links. I pointed out that of you actually read the article there is no need to interpret these clues, since the article plainly and explicitly states it was written in TeXmacs and exported to HTML! Does that clear things up?
- mgubi 5y agoYes it does. I didn't got the phrasing right. Sorry! Anyway my comment is valid, I was not really sure if I should keep the recursive picture or not. But I didn't resisted...