4 ms·
You make it sounds like if Autocad had involved a designer in the process, they would have wound up with google sketch. Sometimes things need to have features,
by tsuraan 15y ago
You make it sounds like if Autocad had involved a designer in the process, they would have wound up with google sketch. Sometimes things need to have features, even features that 90% of users won't need 90% of the time. A good designer shouldn't be the person who decides to cut features, he should be the person who figures out how to keep the features, but in a manner that allows new users to start with a minimum of pain, and expert users to keep growing into the product. That's hard work, and it takes a lot of cleverness and creativity, but I think anybody willing to do that work would be welcome in any sane open source project.
EDIT: on re-reading my post, it looks like I'm saying Autocad didn't have designers, which is completely the opposite of how I feel. What I was trying to get it is that (IMO) Autocad is an amazingly approachable product with tons of features, just presented in a way that isn't terribly daunting to a new user.
- iamcalledrob 15y agoThe people who use AutoCad most likely use it for a living, and the time investment in learning the UI is probably worth it. I feel the same way about Photoshop. People spend time learning its quirks because it's worth it. However, realistically 90% of the features could be cut and it'd be for the good of the product. The problem in the software industry (and this is not limited to Open Source) is that people like long feature lists. This is especially important if you're a Photoshop or an AutoCad. You need new things for the new version.