3 ms·
Wouldn't costs also go down since they're delivering less junk and only stopping at houses that have letters/bills/etc to deliver ?
by AH4oFVbPT4f8 5y ago
Wouldn't costs also go down since they're delivering less junk and only stopping at houses that have letters/bills/etc to deliver ?
- asoneth 5y agoGood point -- I don't know how to estimate the marginal cost of delivering marketing mail but it's certainly not zero. Looking at the same USPS FY2020 financials [1] it looks like marketing mail constitutes a little more than half of the pieces they deliver. That about matches my experience. My guess is that several times a month I have a mailbox that contains solely marketing mail. I'm not sure how much money it would save the USPS if the mail carrier passes by my house without stopping on those days, but I suspect the bigger impact would be dealing with half the physical volume of mail for our household. I still hope we can find a more sustainable path for the USPS than forcing them to stay alive by delivering something no one wants to receive. [1] https://about.usps.com/what/financials/integrated-financial-plans/fy2020.pdf https://about.usps.com/what/financials/integrated-financial-...
- c22 5y agoI am almost 100% paperless with my affairs and nearly every single day I receive a mailbox solely filled with marketing mail.
- josephmosby 5y agoNo. USPS still has to stop by all of the houses anyway to pick up mail as well. So junk mail subsidizes the cost of going to all of those remote homes.