You keep asking the same, What then? which leads me to think we are parting from very different scenarios. Perhaps the difference comes from you thinking in a

You keep asking the same, What then? which leads me to think we are parting from very different scenarios. Perhaps the difference comes from you thinking in a limit that applies as per number of products sold, and you could find yourself on that situation of "what then?" the product being on the shelve but you are unable to buy it. I'm thinking in a scenario where the limit is on the production, similar to what I mention before, the EU controlling vegetable productions. So you don't get to find the product on the shelve if it's already gone but you'll find some other brand, the ones that are better will be more scarce and more pricy as a consequence. Now, do I want as a consumer that the best things are also cheap and available?, yes! of course! But the question is, is that sustainable? and what happens to the market when we have this huge player that outcompete everyone else, and dictate the rules, and they are in a position to set the quality standards, long term we might be free to buy just from them under their own rules. Is that freedom? I'm really not familiar with those proponents of the 10% market, I was just talking from my common sense, I don't think is crazy to put some limits, and we already have some in some industries, for better or worse. I'm dropping it here, but thanks for sharing your point of view, I'll read you if you reply, always learning and open to change my opinion. Cheers!