The irony is real erasers, sometimes even UL and OSHA approved, have cost less than ten eprom chips since the 80s, and have always cost a quarter to a tenth wha

The irony is real erasers, sometimes even UL and OSHA approved, have cost less than ten eprom chips since the 80s, and have always cost a quarter to a tenth what an eprom programmer costs, so all the effort and danger is not saving very much. Ten eproms seems like a lot to people born after the eprom era, but when every build and test cycle requires at least one (or maybe 2 for a 16 bit system, etc) then you can see why people tended to accumulate a hoard of eproms so they'd always have clean erased ready to use ones while actively programming, and erase was done in bulk either because the eraser held 16 chips at once or the erase process could be done in parallel with downtime (while watching TV or something). Also in some cases during the transition era of UV to EEPROM hardware I remember some EEPROMs were pin for pin compatible with some EPROMs and nobody likes waiting for UV, EEPROMs are simply faster. Obviously not all EPROMs have an identical or faster EEPROM twin, but "many" do.