2 ms·
The letter sorting machines are faster and cheaper than manually sorting the same letters... and they were already paid for. You are correct that there is a re
by dsr_ 6y ago
The letter sorting machines are faster and cheaper than manually sorting the same letters... and they were already paid for.
You are correct that there is a reason that they are being ripped out, but it's not because letter volume is down.
- shiftpgdn 6y agoLetter volume is down and the machines need to be replaced with machines that can handle parcels. How are they supposed to replace them!?
- makomk 6y agoManually sorting letters isn't actually the alternative here - what the US Postal Service was moving towards under DeJoy (and probably before him too) was sorting the same letters using the same kind of automatic machines, but a smaller number of them reconfigured to sort into a larger number of different piles using parts from the scrapped machines. This reduces overall capacity, but should be more efficient so long as they don't actually need the extra capacity.