3 ms·
Given everything mentioned in your comment, I don't see how it implies that amazon can't cast a dragnet at some level you're not aware of.
by anotha1 5y ago
Given everything mentioned in your comment, I don't see how it implies that amazon can't cast a dragnet at some level you're not aware of.
- ctvo 5y agoLet's put it in terms of business. What does Amazon gain reading the data of retailers in AWS that they don't already have? How much more money would this make them? How much brand damage and lost of business to AWS (their most profitable organization) would they lose if this were to leak? The more prevalent their use of this AWS customer data, the higher the chance it gets leaked. Why do you think Amazon, one of the most logical and data driven companies, would make such a bad business decision?
- berkeleyjunk 5y agoInfo about what products sell well? Amazon has a thriving white label business and they can use it to decide what to make.
- ctvo 5y agoAnd we think they need to risk the lost of business of breaking into your data on AWS to get this information? They somehow have no other way to infer this? How much business is this thriving Amazon-made products line? It's a fraction of AWS's profits considering retail's overall profits.
- russh 5y agoPeople have done worse for less. It may not be a significant fraction of Amazon’s income but it could be a significant fraction of a sellers income or a significant fraction of sales manager’s sales.
- anotha1 5y ago> They somehow have no other way to infer this? That's actually the point. So what if they're using "anonymous" or other indirect data? If "Amazon.com" might be benefiting from AWS data of any kind then it needs to be investigated as potentially anti-competitive.
- ctvo 5y agoWhen I say infer I mean from analysis of retail trends, pricing, and supply data. They don’t need to raid your AWS account to know that USB cables are profitable.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]