Even if he is right a lot (not a point I'm conceding by any stretch), why pick such an asinine thing as "11% market share means we should treat this market as a

Even if he is right a lot (not a point I'm conceding by any stretch), why pick such an asinine thing as "11% market share means we should treat this market as a regulated utility?" It's an extremely fringe belief, which is saying something given the source.