I don't think the moral judgement is always so easy to find, though. Look at the second amendment, for example: A well regulated Militia, being necessary to th

I don't think the moral judgement is always so easy to find, though. Look at the second amendment, for example: A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. It should be pretty clear to any strict constitutionalist that what's being laid out there is not a moral, inherent right to carry arms but a means to an end. Yes, there is a moral judgement in that it's worth doing things to preserve a free state, but it's several times removed from the actual question being addressed.