> It is a “i” and not a “j”. **J**ulius Caesar said … Why not "Iulius Caesar", for consistency? :-) In any case, English may not be the right language to bick

> It is a “i” and not a “j”. **J**ulius Caesar said … Why not "Iulius Caesar", for consistency? :-) In any case, English may not be the right language to bicker about spelling and pronunciation in. It sports one of the most idiosyncratic orthographic systems in existence. English also has a long history of butchering names, words and sounds, including its own (e.g. the Great Vowel Shift [0]). Iulius vs Julius is the least of its worries. [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Vowel_Shift https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Vowel_Shift