3 ms·
Sadly, the situation is different from Python's. Python 3 is well-defined, with a stable and usable implementation. You can port your code to it today, and eve
by skimbrel 15y ago
Sadly, the situation is different from Python's.
Python 3 is well-defined, with a stable and usable implementation. You can port your code to it today, and even big projects like Django are getting ready to shift over to it.
Perl 6's definition continues to change, with no clear spec, and the leading implementation (Rakudo) doesn't have half of the features built. Even if there were a feature-complete implementation of it I wouldn't dream of starting to port my code over to Perl 6 yet.
Perl 6 is really a different language, and should be named as such. With that out of the way, Perl 5 can then get rid of its "5" and move on to release 16 in a year.
- wunderfool 15y agoit is worth noting that since you are trolling a bit, that the changes evident between python 2 and 3 are only about as significant as those from perl5.12 to perl5.14
- berntb 15y ago>>Sadly, the situation is different from Python's. >>Python 3 is well-defined, with a stable and usable implementation. It is hard to compare. The main similarity between Perl 6 and Python 3 is probably the age. The main difference is that Perl 6 is really, really ambitious.