4 ms·
First, this is a really cool idea, and something that I need. Second, at the risk of disrupting the author's groove (and further belaboring the established cri
by cdata 15y ago
First, this is a really cool idea, and something that I need.
Second, at the risk of disrupting the author's groove (and further belaboring the established criticism of the project name), I've become accustomed to git's convention for commands. A synonymous git-task command would be nice to have for something like this.
- dshipper 15y agoThank you so much for the feedback, I'm really happy I was able to create something that people need. I'm sorry but I'm a little confused as to what the second part of your comment is suggesting. Are you saying that the name should be changed to something like git-task, or that the commands for the utility should follow git's command conventions?
- andredieb 15y agoI'm not sure but I think he meant creating an alias, such as git task. For instance, your commands could be: git task list git task new "Fix homepage styling" That can be achieved if you put something like this on .gitconfig: [alias] task = !tigger
- dshipper 15y agoOh awesome I didn't know about that I'll definitely look into it. Do you think people would be more likely to use it because they can type 'git' instead of 'tigger' (or whatever name it ends up being)?
- cdata 15y agoIt would definitely fit into git's naming convention for commands better. Whether or not that makes it stickier with users is probably an question only focus testing can answer :)