3 ms·
Seems improbable. The Delta V required to catch up with these things would also be an appreciable percentage of the speed of light. The star’s gravity would he
by ashtonkem 6y ago
Seems improbable.
The Delta V required to catch up with these things would also be an appreciable percentage of the speed of light. The star’s gravity would help, but it’s only going to take the edge off what will be an immense acceleration budget. Given that we basically haven’t hit even 0.01C, getting a planetary mass up to this speed seems impossible.
Plus, once you get wherever you’re going, you’d have to pay back whatever boost the star’s gravity gave you as you both escape its gravity well and spend down the velocity that the star itself was going.
- XorNot 6y agoOn the other hand spending your intergalactic voyage orbiting a star would be very convenient from a resources and fuel perspective.
- ashtonkem 6y agoResources maybe, since you’d get sunlight from the star plus whatever material is caught in its orbit. Fuel, no. You’d spend the exact same amount of fuel catching up to this star and eventually leaving its orbit as you’d spend just travelling across the universe alone at the same speed. You’d only save fuel if you used the star for a slight shot maneuver, where you steal a tiny amount of its energy to accelerate you, but this would preclude you spending the voyage in the orbit of this rogue star.
- ncallaway 6y agoIt could be fuel, if you consider fuel to be one of the resources a star can provide you. If your fuel is something that is inside the star (or star's orbit), and you have a means of extracting it, then you can use the star as a refueling point. You're right that using the star wouldn't require less fuel overall, but it could provide you access to extra fuel along the way.
- p1mrx 6y agoYou just need to let the star crash into your vehicle to get it up to speed, and then crash into another star to slow down. Building a vehicle (and passengers) to survive these events is left as an exercise for the reader.