4 ms·
My takeaway is that: a) Charlie Warzel has never run an organization or group of any size. 2) He comes to this tempest-in-a-teapot with a strong POV. Is he r
by kingsuper20 5y ago
My takeaway is that:
a) Charlie Warzel has never run an organization or group of any size.
2) He comes to this tempest-in-a-teapot with a strong POV.
Is he right? wrong? neither? You might as well listen to the guy on the next barstool over. That's the nature of the modern op-ed.
- wrs 5y agoI have, and he’s certainly right about one thing: you won’t successfully influence company culture by just instructing the employees what culture to have.
- raspasov 5y agoOpinion articles are the junk food of the brain.
- otde 5y agoIs running an organization the only way to have expertise on subjects like “how decisions made by organizations affect their members?” I don’t think it’s a stretch to say that a person can collect a fair bit of policy-specific knowledge from being directly affected by said policy. This is not a defense of punditry — I feel pretty icky anytime I see a climate denialist like Bret Stephens opining on climate change in The Paper of Record, for example — but I also don’t think we should necessarily conclude that a person’s relationship to power connotes an inherent level of expertise.