3 ms·
They are excessive but not 'literally useless' - there's clearly a use, it just would be a lot better if that use was being served with less energy. Not that I
by Tenoke 6y ago
They are excessive but not 'literally useless' - there's clearly a use, it just would be a lot better if that use was being served with less energy.
Not that I particularly like BTC at this point - it has been largely superseded by better projects.
- yaa_minu 6y agoBitcoin has been superseded by better projects like? care to give some examples?
- Tenoke 6y agoI'd argue that every non-PoW blockchain is better than Bitcoin. Specifically smart-chains do both what Bitcoin does but also the coin is actually useful beyond a store of value (which they can also be used for). So e.g. Ethereum 2.0, Cardano, Solana etc are all better on everything Bitcoin is criticized for. And if we talk about pure payments, projects like Stellar, Nano (yes, issues currently but getting fixed), and Monero have clear (different) benefits over it.