4 ms·
Yikes I appear to have picked up some bad info. This sounds like a good story, but it's written in a way that I'm expected to fill in the background.
by Forge36 5y ago
Yikes I appear to have picked up some bad info.
This sounds like a good story, but it's written in a way that I'm expected to fill in the background.
- dataflow 5y agoNot exactly sure what you're referring to (what do "this" and "story" refer to?), but for example, for California, I think the relevant clause for the 'major threat' thing I mentioned is this: (d) (1) Subdivision (a) does not apply to the disclosure or distribution of a confidential communication pursuant to any of the following: A party to a confidential communication recording the communication for the purpose of obtaining evidence reasonably believed to relate to the commission by another party to the communication of a crime as specified in Section 633.5. https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displayText.xhtml?lawCode=PEN&part=1.&title=15.&chapter=1.5 https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displayText.x...