3 ms·
I find that issue very confusing. How is a GPL-2 license not acceptable for being listed on a website of GNU projects? I note they went along with the relicens
by technion 5y ago
I find that issue very confusing. How is a GPL-2 license not acceptable for being listed on a website of GNU projects?
I note they went along with the relicense but the site only currently lists "GNU FM" and "GNU Social". Is there an actual compelling argument for a project to choose a license just to be listed alongside those?
- mattl 5y agoGNU FM and GNU social are both AGPL projects. The gnu.io site was for GNU projects that were AGPL.