4 ms·
Yeah, in my experience it takes X years of experience at a company that is already using a monorepo + blaze-derivative tooling, for the costs of setup and maint
by gen220 6y ago
Yeah, in my experience it takes X years of experience at a company that is already using a monorepo + blaze-derivative tooling, for the costs of setup and maintenance to make it worth adoption.
That X is mostly a function of how open you are to the idea that maintaining + using a centralized, language-agnostic build graph is a Useful Thing.
But once that X is crossed, I don't think it's possible to happily go back to a non-monorepo environment. :)
FWIW, we've used Pants successfully for years, which has excellent Python support. However, we're in a long-haul migration to Bazel, so you might be better off revisiting Bazel if you want to invest in something that's extremely likely to issue dividends over the next 10 years.
- throwaway894345 6y agoWe used Pants as well, and it worked alright for Python. But it’s codebase was a mess and it was also difficult to extend. I get the strong feeling that there is a better way to make a build system—perhaps something like Nix but without so many usability problems—but no one is investing in that right now.