3 ms·
From some of the replies further down that thread, it appears this is not as big a problem as it first seems. First of all, the dynamic linker is slow and not
by DoomHotel 5y ago
From some of the replies further down that thread, it appears this is not as big a problem as it first seems.
First of all, the dynamic linker is slow and not optimized for program startup times. [ https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/4b77489c05f6459ead7233c3fb69f61e@AcuMS.aculab.com/ https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/4b77489c05f6459ead7233c3fb69f61... ]
And second, compiling clang with Profile Guided Optimization makes a big difference. [ https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/YItU3YrFi8REwkRA@archlinux-ax161/ https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/YItU3YrFi8REwkRA@archlinux-ax16... ]
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]