5 ms·

Call recording is only legal with single party consent in 2 states. Google voice allows recording incoming calls, but not outgoing. 1) Low demand 2) High impac

Call recording is only legal with single party consent in 2 states. Google voice allows recording incoming calls, but not outgoing. 1) Low demand 2) High impact of getting it wrong (untested legal consequences?) 3) lack of a good story. IE: why can't you track what was said in another method? Ie: paper note

dataflow 5y ago
> Call recording is only legal with single party consent in 2 states. Call recording is legal even in 2 party consent states... with consent. Also often legal if it's to protect against a major criminal threat. > IE: why can't you track what was said in another method? Ie: paper note Try convicting your attacker with that.
- hellbannedguy 5y ago
  I remember that Trump tape where the governor taped, and released, the conversation to the public. Something like, "I need you to find 1300 votes in my favor." It turns out that Georgia is one of those states. You can tape a person without their consent, and broadcast it?
- Forge36 5y ago
  Yikes I appear to have picked up some bad info. This sounds like a good story, but it's written in a way that I'm expected to fill in the background.
  - dataflow 5y ago
    Not exactly sure what you're referring to (what do "this" and "story" refer to?), but for example, for California, I think the relevant clause for the 'major threat' thing I mentioned is this: (d) (1) Subdivision (a) does not apply to the disclosure or distribution of a confidential communication pursuant to any of the following: A party to a confidential communication recording the communication for the purpose of obtaining evidence reasonably believed to relate to the commission by another party to the communication of a crime as specified in Section 633.5. https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displayText.xhtml?lawCode=PEN&part=1.&title=15.&chapter=1.5 https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displayText.x...
Sebguer 5y ago
> Call recording is only legal with single party consent in 2 states. What? Federally call recording is legal with single party consent. 35 states and DC have single party consent.

dataflow 5y ago

> Call recording is only legal with single party consent in 2 states. Call recording is legal even in 2 party consent states... with consent. Also often legal if it's to protect against a major criminal threat. > IE: why can't you track what was said in another method? Ie: paper note Try convicting your attacker with that.

hellbannedguy 5y ago
I remember that Trump tape where the governor taped, and released, the conversation to the public. Something like, "I need you to find 1300 votes in my favor." It turns out that Georgia is one of those states. You can tape a person without their consent, and broadcast it?
Forge36 5y ago
Yikes I appear to have picked up some bad info. This sounds like a good story, but it's written in a way that I'm expected to fill in the background.
- dataflow 5y ago
  Not exactly sure what you're referring to (what do "this" and "story" refer to?), but for example, for California, I think the relevant clause for the 'major threat' thing I mentioned is this: (d) (1) Subdivision (a) does not apply to the disclosure or distribution of a confidential communication pursuant to any of the following: A party to a confidential communication recording the communication for the purpose of obtaining evidence reasonably believed to relate to the commission by another party to the communication of a crime as specified in Section 633.5. https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displayText.xhtml?lawCode=PEN&part=1.&title=15.&chapter=1.5 https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displayText.x...

Sebguer 5y ago

> Call recording is only legal with single party consent in 2 states. What? Federally call recording is legal with single party consent. 35 states and DC have single party consent.