> So this author is trying to convey the importance of having multiple lenses That is important no doubt. I would have preferred seeing a short practical list

> So this author is trying to convey the importance of having multiple lenses That is important no doubt. I would have preferred seeing a short practical list of what those different lenses are. As it is, a contemplative article like this makes me think there is not much understanding of the subject at hand, therefore let me convey to you the feeling that I don't know if my approach is correct here's some other "lenses" that might be more or less correct too ... No doubt the topic is a difficult one so it is good that people are thinking about it and trying to verbalize some possible solutions.