3 ms·
>If google does not react swiftly, it is considered guilty of copyright infringement. Only if a copyright infringement has actually taken place. The problem i
by Normille 6y ago
>If google does not react swiftly, it is considered guilty of copyright infringement.
Only if a copyright infringement has actually taken place.
The problem is that none of these companies ever apply a gramme of logic or examine the merits of the claim, when someone cries 'copyright infringement'. They just automatically remove the 'offending' article and refuse to countenance any counter-arguments from the person accused.
It's this supine attitude which, I reckon, is fuelling all these ridiculous claims. I just wish that the likes of Amazon, Google, YouTube, RedBubble... etc. would call the copyright trolls' bluff occasionally and not just instantly cave. Every. Single. Time.
- dragonwriter 6y ago> The problem is that none of these companies ever apply a gramme of logic or examine the merits of the claim True, but, TBF, evaluating merits doesn’t scale, the authors of the safe harbor provision knew this, and this is exactly the outcome the law intended, though it does not mandate it.