4 ms·
The M1 Air might be the best hardware I've ever purchased. It not only matches the hype, it exceeds it. I also switched permanently from Ubuntu on an X1 Carbon
by wp381640 5y ago
The M1 Air might be the best hardware I've ever purchased. It not only matches the hype, it exceeds it.
I also switched permanently from Ubuntu on an X1 Carbon - docked into a 4k screen.
Unit tests and builds run faster, VS Code for both client and server dev is very responsive (3-4 react / python projects open at once with the language servers running), battery life is out of this world - I don't even pack my charger when I'm out on the road all day.
The machine just feels very snappy - even with 20+ apps open, videos playing, 50 or so browser tabs, watchdog running for dev (css, uvicorn). I feel like I spend a lot less time waiting on the machine. No fan spinning and barely any heat.
I really enjoy switching back now to using Microsoft Office and the Adobe Suite instead of the OSS alternatives.
I don't think RAM is like-for-like comparable in terms of capacity, because I see a lot less memory pressure on the 8GB air (I didn't want to wait the 2 weeks for the 16GB delivery) than on my 16GB i7 X1.
The disadvantages come down to architecture compatibility (problems building cryptography and numpy from pypi which was resolved). I offset this by also running a dev server environment on my HP Micro (with ESXi and a bunch of docker machines) over the LAN.
I've since switched my primary desktop to an M1 Mini (16GB) driving 2x 4k screens, and will use the Air for on-the-road work and personal browsing.
I still have the X1 Carbon sitting on my desk - but find myself using it less and less.
The only other disadvantages are number of USB-C ports on the Air - you'll probably want a hub with power pass-through. The display on the air also isn't the brightest - but still comparable to the X1. The pro is better in this regard. Third disadvantage is inability to access high-end GPU if you require one.
There is no real cost argument against the M1 - I don't even know how to spec an equiv X1 Carbon with similar performance, but even customizing the upgrade to a similar WQXGA display and 400 nits takes you to $3k+ (AUD) while the M1 air was $1950 (with 512GB). Leaves you change to get an x86 server to put on the LAN [0].
I'm a huge, huge fan of the M1 and endorse it to everyone I know. It really is a game-changer.
[0] Geekbench for the intel i7 i7-10510U in the X1 shows 992 single core score 3106 multicore, vs 1700 and 7375 for the M1 air. The display is 1440p (vs 1600) and 300 nits vs 400
- throw_this_one 5y ago8gb is fine for all that multitasking? Some say it's fine and some say "you have to get 16gb!"
- wp381640 5y agoI think i'm ok with it on the Air but went with 16GB for my desktop. On the Air right now I have 20+ apps open (Firefox, Brave, Chrome, Safari, Slack, Signal, WhatsApp, Microsoft Todo, Excel (4 sheets open), Mail, Calendar, VS Code (2 projects open), iTerm (8 tabs), Postico, Datagrip, Contacts, Messenger, Spotify, Calibre, Docker for Mac (4 containers running) Memory used is 6.47GB of 8GB physical, cached filed 1.2GB, swap used 8.15GB It's running more than fine. It's why I don't think you can compare with other systems in terms of RAM capacity - there is no way I would get away with what I have open now on an 8GB machine running Ubuntu desktop