What I think I’ll take from this is how a lot of organizational policies have simple human emotional reasons behind them. Reading the official company stances,

What I think I’ll take from this is how a lot of organizational policies have simple human emotional reasons behind them. Reading the official company stances, they all look like reasonable, well meaning changes. But then 1/3 of your organization quits? There must be more to this! And in fact its just a normal human squabble, with broken promises, public dressing downs, power assertions. It can kind of put into perspective a lot of big policies in general. That almost certainly what we know today as pillars of reasoned thought, has originated by some basic human desires, and what we’re reading is only their rationalizations. I mean it’s obvious of course, but this here is a _really_ good clear cut example of it.