5 ms·
Giving thought to principles and those principles being "good" or realistic have nothing to do with each other. I don't want to bring up obvious examples but th
by aniforprez 5y ago
Giving thought to principles and those principles being "good" or realistic have nothing to do with each other. I don't want to bring up obvious examples but there are tons of examples where principles with a great deal of thought have been clearly destructive. I cannot believe the kind of childish simplistic thinking going on in this thread
- nailer 5y agoYou don’t think that ideas being more considered means they’re more likely to be worthy of having? > I cannot believe the kind of childish simplistic thinking going on in this thread Yes.
- aniforprez 5y agoUh do you really want me to spoon feed you the obvious examples of people with strongly held opinions devastating large swathes of the world? Clearly their ideas were very well considered except they're not particularly "worthy of having"
- nailer 5y agoThe counter examples don’t disprove the effect. Yes we’ve had long considered ideas like communism that have resulted in the deaths of more than a hundred million people, no that does not disprove the notion that on average ideas that are more considered are of higher value that ideas that are not considered.