3 ms·

No an employee should not have to accept anything, and in the US does not have to. My key point here is that in companies that allow discussions, I can ask que

No an employee should not have to accept anything, and in the US does not have to. My key point here is that in companies that allow discussions, I can ask questions of the policies I disagree with to understand what motivates the policies. I can propose alternative viewpoints. Often, via having open uncensored discussions I find that it is much easier to disagree and commit In the Emmet / Trump example, he explained the reasoning (we are a platform) and allowed us to grumble. Had there also been a policy that anyone complaining would be terminated, I’m not so sure I would have deployed the website that day. Hope that answers your question

Dracophoenix 5y ago
Thank you for answering my questions. I appreciate your insight. In your opinion as a professional, what should Armstrong and DHH have done without kowtowing to their employees? And while I still have your attention on Twitch, what is with the company's hypocritical stance on scantily-clad women (a la Alinity) and copyright abuses while claiming that it isn't allowed? Your employment seems to have been contemporaneous with those episodes, so it seems like you would know a few things.
- joshribakoff 5y ago
  I just deployed the website and worked on dev tooling, I don’t have any comment on Twitch moderation. I’m not convinced Armstrong and DHH had such a drastic flame war problem, for example after banning politics, Armstrong made several public political rants including endorsing Kanye West - http://modernconsensus.com/politics/ceo-of-apolitical-coinbase-shares-blog-post-about-voting-for-kanye-west/ http://modernconsensus.com/politics/ceo-of-apolitical-coinba... Perhaps they should have done what most other companies do, and ignore the “problem” if employees are otherwise productive, and if not then replace unproductive employees with productive ones. Whether an employee is productive is tangential to their political beliefs, and an employee who is causing waves over politics will just cause waves over something else if you ban politics. I would work for someone who I disagreed with, but if an employer tries to silence me and turns around and advocates for their own political candidate, it seems to me the employer is being narrow minded, underhanded, and hypocritical

Dracophoenix 5y ago

Thank you for answering my questions. I appreciate your insight. In your opinion as a professional, what should Armstrong and DHH have done without kowtowing to their employees? And while I still have your attention on Twitch, what is with the company's hypocritical stance on scantily-clad women (a la Alinity) and copyright abuses while claiming that it isn't allowed? Your employment seems to have been contemporaneous with those episodes, so it seems like you would know a few things.

joshribakoff 5y ago
I just deployed the website and worked on dev tooling, I don’t have any comment on Twitch moderation. I’m not convinced Armstrong and DHH had such a drastic flame war problem, for example after banning politics, Armstrong made several public political rants including endorsing Kanye West - http://modernconsensus.com/politics/ceo-of-apolitical-coinbase-shares-blog-post-about-voting-for-kanye-west/ http://modernconsensus.com/politics/ceo-of-apolitical-coinba... Perhaps they should have done what most other companies do, and ignore the “problem” if employees are otherwise productive, and if not then replace unproductive employees with productive ones. Whether an employee is productive is tangential to their political beliefs, and an employee who is causing waves over politics will just cause waves over something else if you ban politics. I would work for someone who I disagreed with, but if an employer tries to silence me and turns around and advocates for their own political candidate, it seems to me the employer is being narrow minded, underhanded, and hypocritical