3 ms·
If 'gender of partner' counts as 'details', that's a pretty extreme stance to take. (If not, the original point still stands.)
by retsibsi 5y ago
If 'gender of partner' counts as 'details', that's a pretty extreme stance to take. (If not, the original point still stands.)
- Baeocystin 5y agoI mean this politely- please stop assigning the worst possible interpretation to what I'm saying. It goes against the spirit of discussion, and doesn't generate insight.
- retsibsi 5y agoI don't receive it very politely. It's clearly condescending, and from my perspective you are the one reading uncharitably. I explicitly didn't assume either interpretation of your statement; my point was that it was either extreme or, as far as I understood the thread of this discussion, irrelevant. (This subchain began with someone pointing out that one's sexual orientation will naturally be revealed in a work context.)