4 ms·
My issues with this are it's ageist and unequal, teenagers are people too. Many teenagers work harder and are smarter then many adults. It glosses over the fact
by asperous 5y ago
My issues with this are it's ageist and unequal, teenagers are people too. Many teenagers work harder and are smarter then many adults. It glosses over the fact that some teenagers sadly have to support children and adult parents as well. Symbolically it tells teenagers they aren't worth as much as adults. It could reduce age diversity in some jobs which can be important.
I never understood the argument that middle class teenagers either should be given opportunities, or the opposite that they should leave those opportunities to adults. Society shouldn't be picking and choosing who gets what opportunities based on things as broad as age.
- Robotbeat 5y agoKids are often not allowed to work full time and ARE required to go to school until 18. You can consider anti-child-labor laws to be ageist, and maybe you'll be technically correct but that's irrelevant. Age discrimination actually is good in this case. Kids should be in school and shouldn't be forced to have to work.