3 ms·
Then that means the software is hopelessly inadequate for the current environment where wide-scale hacking is a constant problem. To echo what they said, why do
by Veserv 6y ago
Then that means the software is hopelessly inadequate for the current environment where wide-scale hacking is a constant problem. To echo what they said, why do we accept and deploy systems that catastrophically fail in circumstances that we know are going to occur? Why is it acceptable to take systems that were not previously connected and actively make a decision to connect them to internet if they are completely unfit for that environment? And not just that, they are so unfit that they not only fail in the new environment, but they enable total organizational collapse in a way reminiscent of the exhaust port on the Death Star.
- fnord77 6y agowhy? because companies engineering the software cut corners to save costs, or their engineering talent isn't competent or talented enough to produce products that don't have majors vulns. You can better believe software running an aircraft carrier has been hardened 12 ways til sunday. Prosumer operating systems - not so much.