4 ms·
Look at this comparison. Fairphone has a smaller screen but is larger, heavier, lower quality screen, and is not dust/waterpoof, and costs double compared with
by JoshTko 5y ago
Look at this comparison. Fairphone has a smaller screen but is larger, heavier, lower quality screen, and is not dust/waterpoof, and costs double compared with the Galaxy S8. Fairphone only matches or loses on all other specs.
https://versus.com/en/fairphone-3-vs-samsung-galaxy-s8 https://versus.com/en/fairphone-3-vs-samsung-galaxy-s8
- operator-name 5y agoBut also look at the AirPods Pro vs Galaxy Buds+: https://www.ifixit.com/Teardown/AirPods+Pro+Teardown/127551 https://www.ifixit.com/Teardown/AirPods+Pro+Teardown/127551 https://www.ifixit.com/Teardown/Samsung+Galaxy+Buds++Teardown/132702 https://www.ifixit.com/Teardown/Samsung+Galaxy+Buds++Teardow... One has a zero whilst the other has a 7 by ifixit's rating.
- JoshTko 5y agoBuds are heavier, larger by volume, and are less water resistant.
- operator-name 5y agoWeight isn't an important metric unless it's greater than the threshold of uncomfortableness. The majority of the weight difference comes from the extra battery which is a tradeoff. Similarly for volume, in which the case dimensions is the important metric. Once again the volume is a battery tradeoff. As for water resistance yes, the buds+ are IP2X versus IP4X. Under normal use this isn't important, but if argued this is the better point than bulkiness. https://www.rtings.com/headphones/tools/compare/samsung-galaxy-buds-truly-wireless-vs-apple-airpods-pro-truly-wireless/792/1625 https://www.rtings.com/headphones/tools/compare/samsung-gala... The point is that these are comparable devices and repairability doesn't have to make the drastic tradeoffs as your example of the fairphone 3.