IANAL but I know that it is possible in some instances to challenge a contract which is written to seem to give you X but really gives you nothing. I've read s

IANAL but I know that it is possible in some instances to challenge a contract which is written to seem to give you X but really gives you nothing. I've read some of the contract clauses and would love to know if that kind of obscurant legalese is common. I know that legal documents often use very specific language in order to express very particular claims and conditions, but this looked to be deliberately confusing, like some kind of Dada-infused Post-modernist Johnnie Cochran.