> no access at all, which is clearly secure Not "clearly secure" -- rather it would be 'security by obscurity': https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Security_by_obs

> no access at all, which is clearly secure Not "clearly secure" -- rather it would be 'security by obscurity': https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Security_by_obscurity https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Security_by_obscurity Quote: Security through obscurity (or security by obscurity) is the reliance in security engineering on design or implementation secrecy as the main method of providing security to a system or component. Security experts have rejected this view as far back as 1851, and advise that obscurity should never be the only security mechanism.