2 ms·
It is, though that's not very surprising. Here's a quick proof: S-K combinators[1] are a Turing-complete subset of lambda calculus. Here's an implementation of
by Wilfred 15y ago
It is, though that's not very surprising. Here's a quick proof:
S-K combinators[1] are a Turing-complete subset of lambda calculus. Here's an implementation of them:
k = (x) ->
(y) -> x
s = (x) ->
(y) ->
(z) -> x(z)(y(z))
1: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SKI_combinator_calculus http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SKI_combinator_calculus